Edited by Blazer, 11 May 2012 - 03:38 PM.
The Rep system
#1
Posted 11 May 2012 - 03:38 PM
#2
Posted 11 May 2012 - 08:15 PM
As you said, there is no reason to have it. But then again, there's also no reason not to have it. Unless you are some sort of E-Peen addicts.
#3
Posted 11 May 2012 - 08:18 PM
Edited by Eduardo Knuckles, 11 May 2012 - 10:29 PM.
#4
Posted 11 May 2012 - 08:34 PM
Edited by DeoxysKyogre, 11 May 2012 - 08:35 PM.
#5
Posted 11 May 2012 - 11:41 PM
#6
Posted 12 May 2012 - 12:27 AM
As for the Rep thing, I personally do not notice it. I only notice it as soon as someone mentions it =P
#7
Posted 12 May 2012 - 03:19 AM
Oh, there is. Those abusing the system can't rely on a cloak of annonymity to protect them.I'm pretty sure theres a way we can find out who has been giving the rep points
#8
Posted 12 May 2012 - 01:49 PM
In them cases, I do tend to reduce or increase the points on them posts to try and set them back from minus or positive, to 0, but often 1 point simply isn't enough, and I cannot do my own posts, and I suggest you guys do the same, if a post is made and you don't feel it requires any change in points, try to set it back to 0 (to sort of... level it up a bit).
I believe there are two or three individuals, giving or taking points from posts simply based on the "popularity" or "respect" of the member, rather than the post itself, looking at half of my own posts, I cannot really see myself earning over 100 points if I had not have made all of those awesome hacks I did through the years, not to say that they haven't changed the way I think and post mind, but it does show that the reputation point system doesn't always function the way it is suppose to, because certain people simply don't understand how to use them responsibly.
To answer your question, no, the reputation system isn't "needed" but it can be nice to have, it would be nicer if it were used properly for the right reasons though.
#9
Posted 12 May 2012 - 04:50 PM
As a suggestion only... I think it could be added to the rules, Ordos.Oh, there is. Those abusing the system can't rely on a cloak of annonymity to protect them.I'm pretty sure theres a way we can find out who has been giving the rep points
#10
Posted 12 May 2012 - 05:01 PM
As a suggestion only... I think it could be added to the rules, Ordos.
Oh, there is. Those abusing the system can't rely on a cloak of annonymity to protect them.I'm pretty sure theres a way we can find out who has been giving the rep points
Nice idea, I am giving you a rep point!
#11
Posted 12 May 2012 - 06:08 PM
#12
Posted 12 May 2012 - 08:55 PM
#13
Posted 12 May 2012 - 09:19 PM
Also, it's weird that there's people with 3 or 4 rep points, then some of us has 43 odd, then MarkeyJester with 128! =P
#14
Posted 13 May 2012 - 12:45 PM
That said I've never been a big fan of the +, 'like' and similar rating systems either.
#15
Posted 13 May 2012 - 05:10 PM
#16
Posted 15 May 2012 - 07:12 AM
#17
Posted 15 May 2012 - 08:14 AM
#18
Posted 15 May 2012 - 01:48 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



This topic is locked








